AUCC adds new fodder to federal government's pending S&T Strategy

Guest Contributor
February 26, 2007

Canada's universities have weighed in with a timely dose of advice for the government's federal S&T strategy. The Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC) calls for a range of expensive yet uncosted recommendations that touch on all aspects of the university research funding environment, including provisions for new training support, management and governance.

The AUCC prepared its submission following the government's release of its Economic and Fiscal Update and accompanying Advantage Canada document. The latter reaffirms the government's intent to release an S&T Strategy, increase spending to boost science capacity and consider transfering management of certain government laboratories to the academic sector (R$, November 27/06).

The submission to the ministers of Industry and Finance contains recommendations in three broad areas: expanding the university research enterprise while developing critical mass in selected areas, research talent and governance, measurement and evaluation (see chart). They are intended to encourage the government to enhance its support for university-based research as a means to confront increasing global competition for knowledge and talent.

"The AUCC has been consistent in laying out what is needed for the future and these three areas reflect that consistency," says AUCC president Claire Morris. "The (S&T) Strategy has been a moving target but Advantage Canada provides pretty broad guidelines for where the government wants to go. It's likely to be a broad strategy — a framework as opposed to a full action agenda."

The AUCC submission is accompanied by two discussion papers intended to provide guidance for measuring the impact of federal investments in university research and maximizing the efficiency, effectiveness and accountability of those investments. Morris says the main submission pulls all of the AUCC's recommendations into one formal document that is both timely and pertinent to the Strategy's ultimate impact.

"This is not intended to be a budget submission. The S&T Strategy is a long-term strategy and investments are needed so you're looking at a fairly robust sum," she says. "This is our sense of what the government is trying to do in developing a strategy, not short-term budget initiatives."

While many of the recommendations such as 40% support for indirect costs are not new, others reflect a more holistic perspective on the research environment. The Canada Foundation for Innovation is now referred to as one of four federal granting agencies while CANARIE is recognized as a key piece of the country's knowledge infrastructure.

The release date of the federal S&T Strategy has yet tobe announced but is expected along with, or shortly after, the March 19th Budget.

R$

AUCC SUBMISSION HIGHLIGHTS

* Continue supporting a wide range of research disciplines while pursuing promising areas of opportunity

* Fund indirect costs of university research at a minimum of 40%

* Renew mandate and funding of CFI

* Address CFI operating funding to ensure long-term sustainability of large-scale research infrastructure

* Renew mandate of CANARIE and treat CAnet 4 as fundamental knowledge infrastructure

* Work with communities, academia and provinces to facilitate development of know-ledge and innovation clusters

* Expand and rethink Networks of Centres of Excellence model in a way that recognizes importance of both business-led and university-led Networks.

* Increase support for graduate students

* Create a flagship program of international graduate scholarships

* Provide for greater numbers of graduate students to be engaged in research conducted by their faculty mentors

* Develop incentives for research internships and research-based co-op placements

* Consider programs similar to the EU's Marie Curie Research Training Networks

* Increase interagency collaboration between four main federal research granting agencies

* Create a coordinating committee for four granting agencies along the Irish model

* Adopt agile use of multiple evaluation tools to measure success and inform policy development

* Transfer of management of federal labs to universities should include a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of each party and requisite financial resources for management and long-term sustainability



Other News






Events For Leaders in
Science, Tech, Innovation, and Policy


Discuss and learn from those in the know at our virtual and in-person events.



See Upcoming Events










You have 1 free article remaining.
Don't miss out - start your free trial today.

Start your FREE trial    Already a member? Log in






Top

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. We use cookies to provide you with a great experience and to help our website run effectively in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.